Novel Theranostic Reagent Could Enhance Detection and Therapy of Prostate Cancer

November 26, 2019

Reston, VA—A recently discovered prostate cancer-selective antigen has been identified as a useful molecular imaging target for the detection and targeting of metastatic prostate cancer lesions, as reported in the November issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. Using a novel radiotracer, researchers were able to effectively image STEAP1 (six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate-1) in tumors and localize a large number of lesions.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a significant health care problem, with more than 42,000 cases projected in 2020. “While significant strides have been made in detection of mCRPC with radiolabeled antibodies and small molecules that recognize prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), other important potential targets, such as STEAP1, could be imaged to identify presence of mCRPC and possibly serve as therapeutic targets,” said Jorge A. Carrasquillo, MD, who performed the study while an attending physician at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York. “89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109 represents a novel theranostic reagent to both identify the extent of metastatic prostate cancer and select patients for STEAP1-directed therapies.”

The prospective single-phase study included 19 patients with histologically confirmed progressing mCRPC with documented metastatic disease on bone scans, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients received approximately 185 MBq/10mg of 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A and were imaged four to seven days after the injection. Uptake and localization in tumor were measured and compared with bone and CT scans. Bone and soft tissue biopsy samples also were evaluated.

Figure 1: 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A maximum-intensity projections of selected patients with bone metastases of various extents. Images were acquired at 6 d after injection and are displayed at same gray scale with SUVmax of 10. Patients in upper panel (particularly patients 3 and 9) have extensive metastatic bone disease. Uptake in noninvolved bone is low and not definitely seen in projection images. Physiologic blood-pool activity was prominent soon after injection, and much less blood-pool activity is seen in late images in those with more extensive bony disease. Uptake in liver is partially reflective of blood-pool activity and parenchymal accumulation. Low-level uptake is also noted in kidneys, and variable uptake is noted in bowel (intraluminal), which probably represents route of excretion. Credit: Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Bernard M. Fine, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Steven M. Larson et al.  Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Genentech Inc.


All patients imaged with 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A were considered positive for bone lesions, and eight patients were considered to have soft-tissue disease. Localization of 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A in suspected bone metastases was observed in all patients; a total of 515 sites were recorded as positive. Analysis of bone lesions showed a median maximum SUV of 20.6, while an analysis of soft tissue lesions showed a median maximum SUV of 16.8.

Researchers also analyzed biopsies performed under other research protocols or for clinical indications either before or after imaging with 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A. High uptake values of 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A were noted in 11 of 12 bone sites biopsied and all five soft-tissue sites, each of which was confirmed as histologically positive. As researchers were unable to biopsy all cancerous lesions, a Bayesian approach was used to apply information gleaned from biopsied lesions to project the number of cancerous lesions in each patient. Use of this approach resulted in a best estimate of 86 percent of histologically positive lesions being true-positive on imaging with 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to report in detail on the imaging findings of targeting STEAP1,” said Carrasquillo. “Given the high SUV in tumor and localization of a large number of lesions, this reagent warrants further exploration as a companion diagnostic in patients undergoing STEAP1-directed therapy.”

He continued, “The difference we observed in targeting PSMA with various radiotracers in patients with prostate cancer may possibly reflect differences related to the biology of STEAP1-versus PSMA-positive prostate cancer. Furthermore, as radiolabeled anti-PSMA antibodies were superseded by small molecules for PSMA imaging, there is potential to develop small molecules to target STEAP1 as well.”

The authors of “Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody” include Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Neeta Pandit-Taskar and Steven M. Larson, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, and Center for Targeted Radioimmunotherapy and Diagnosis, Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, New York, New York; Stephen E. Fleming, Josef J. Fox, Sarah M. Cheal and Shutian Ruan, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Bernard M. Fine and Simon P. Williams, Genentech, South San Francisco, California; Joseph A. O’Donoghue and John L. Humm, Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Govind Ragupathi, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Serge K. Lyashchenko, Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Howard I. Scher, Daniel C. Danila and Michael J. Morris, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York and Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; and Mithat Gönen, Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

###

Please visit the SNMMI Media Center for more information about molecular imaging and precision medicine. To schedule an interview with the researchers, please contact Rebecca Maxey at (703) 652-6772 or rmaxey@snmmi.org. Current and past issues of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine can be found online at http://jnm.snmjournals.org.

About The Journal of Nuclear Medicine

The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (JNM) is the world’s leading nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and theranostics journal, accessed more than 9 million times each year by practitioners around the globe, providing them with the information they need to advance this rapidly expanding field.

JNM is published by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), an international scientific and medical organization dedicated to advancing nuclear medicine and molecular imaging—precision medicine that allows diagnosis and treatment to be tailored to individual patients in order to achieve the best possible outcomes. For more information, visit www.snmmi.org.